His work follows a pattern that is familiar to most business people. Get the job specs, cost it out, and submit a bid. Part of the cost estimate is based on the cost of raw material - in his case, that's primarily concrete. Yesterday he got a notice from his primary concrete supplier that the cost of concrete is going up by a substantial amount. This forces him to choose from several options, none of which are attractive. He can raise his prices, which either makes his bids less competitive or forces his customers to pass the increased cost along to their customers, which eventually affects the greater economy. He can eat the price increase, which reduces his margins and leads to cost-cutting; reduced salaries and/or reduced number of employees, which also eventually affects the greater economy. He can reduce the quality of the concrete he uses, making the end product less desirable (for example, he can substitute Portland cement for concrete, which is okay for some projects, but not appropriate for others).
Those are all problems familiar to most business people. But what makes this case interesting is that it is an excellent example of the Law of Unintended Consequences.
The law of unintended consequences, often cited but rarely defined, is that actions of people—and especially of government—always have effects that are unanticipated or unintended.The price increase of concrete is an unintended consequence of obama's war on coal.
Coal generates 40% of America's electricity—more than any other energy source ... The EPA's war on coal has troubling economic implications for every American and U.S. business. As the new regulations take effect, Americans could see their electric bills increase annually by more than 10% ... Coal also provides, directly and indirectly, hundreds of thousands of jobs across the country ... the EPA's anti-coal crusade could terminate 600,000 American jobs by 2023 while dampening economic growth by more than $2 trillion.In addition to raising electric rates and cutting jobs, shutting down coal power plants eliminates the primary source of fly ash, which is a critical component in concrete. Another well-known law, the Law of Supply and Demand, tells us that a reduction in supply results in an increase in price (assuming demand holds steady). Thus less fly ash means more expensive concrete. That not only affects my son's business, but every business and project that uses concrete - roads, new homes, new commercial construction, and so on.
Intellectually, I was familiar with all this. But until I talked with my son I didn't grasp the real impact of barry's misguided policies on real people, their families, and the greater economy. Just one more example of why that loser is so bad for this country, and why we'll be so better off when that worthless asshole is out of office...
4 comments:
Excellent observation. Somehow we need to tie civil service salaries directly to the economic consequences of their actions.
Tim - Yep, it is insane. I am a project manager/estimator for a concrete company and have been through all the same issues. I don't have the headache of ownership but it's a trade off, my owner is a very wealthy man from over thirty years in business. But I digress.
It's difficult enough to run the company but all of these regulations become a paperwork nightmare let alone the costs associated with misguided political regulations. My job is 60/40 now. 50% compliance 50% work related. Adding material cost increases adds to the headache.
WSF - Good idea. I wish we could, not just the civil service drones but elected officials as well.
Jeff - Out of the 10 people on his payroll, one is an office manager who has a similar workload split - 50% managing the business, 50% dealing with government regs. Not to mention the lawyer and accountant, who spend a lot of billable hours on the same thing.
Ahem, you two guys with the concrete hook-ups, my company is often in desperate need of concrete and/or concrete subs...especially in the wilds of the Permian. If you can help, email me.
Post a Comment