Showing posts with label FID. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FID. Show all posts

Monday, November 30, 2015

I Have A .45 ACP Solution

IMO Liam Neeson is a typical Hollywood hypocritical liberal. He is an anti-gun nut, while at the same time making his fortune portraying an action hero who uses firearms to deal with bad guys.
Actor Liam Neeson is no fan of the Second Amendment despite the content of many of his films.

In the past decade or so, Neeson has arguably rebooted his career by starring in movies, such as the Taken franchise, that prominently feature lots of gunplay and hand-to-hand combat. Despite his action hero screen persona (and meal ticket), he believes that the right of individuals to keep and bear arms under the U.S. Constitution is a “problem” and gun control is the solution.
His hypocrisy disgusts me, and I am boycotting his movies (not that it will make much difference, but at least it makes me feel better).

Anyway, the first movie in the Taken series, in which his daughter is kidnapped by a sex slavery ring, hits home with me. Our daughter is applying for a college study abroad program next summer in Spain. She's a smart kid who can for the most part take care of herself (she has a black belt in karate), but having grown up in a small town in Central Texas she has zero street smarts. To make matter worse, Spain - and Europe in general - is in the midst of a muslim-inspired rape epidemic.
Muslim men rape non-Muslim women (and girls) in disproportionately high numbers in countries with growing Muslim minority populations. Rape of infidel women is part of Islamic law and Islamic tradition. As such, it’s been going on for centuries.

This article is about the current threat Muslim rapists pose to non-Muslim women. In order to keep this article to a reasonable length, the focus is on the rape epidemic in Europe, but suffice it to say rape jihad is a gruesome reality the world over.

Perhaps there is no European country where rape has reached epidemic proportions as it has in Sweden, a country now known as the “rape capital” of Europe. Sweden ranks Number 2 on the global list of rape countries. From 1975 to present, rape in Sweden has increased 1472%. Based on this model, it is now projected that one in four Swedish women (and sometimes little girls) will be raped. Rape of men and boys is also on the rise.

Making this nightmarish situation worse, the authorities hide what’s going on, make outlandish excuses for it, and/or side with the rapists ... Few, if any, will state the truth: that the majority of rapes in Sweden are committed by Muslim males.

But Sweden is not the only European country where rape has become commonplace. Importing Muslims en masse has taken a toll across the continent. With the recent avalanche of young Muslim males sweeping across Europe, violence is rising even further. Including rape.

In the United Kingdom rape is occurring on such a massive scale that women no longer feel safe taking a taxi cab. Meanwhile, Muslim child sex trafficking gangs have become so pervasive it is estimated there may be as many as one million victims. One million! It has been referred to as rape on an “industrial scale.” And how has this massive attack against non-Muslim girls in the United Kingdom been addressed by the authorities? They’ve covered up the truth, often blaming the victims. Political leaders, the police, the courts, the media. You name it. They’re overflowing with cowards, leaving children to suffer the unthinkable horrors of kidnapping, torture, and rape.

In Holland, sex trafficking gangs run by Muslim men are also on the rise. In Germany, rape committed by “asylum seekers” is skyrocketing as rape by Muslim men is explained away as “cultural misunderstandings.” So to avoid such “misunderstandings” girls are told to cover up lest they draw attention to themselves and be raped.

In Austria, women are feeling the impact of this current avalanche of Muslim invaders, as when a 72-year-old woman was recently raped by a 17-year-old “asylum seeker.” In France, gang rape is on the rise. As with the rest of Europe, if the rapists are brought to trial they barely serve time for their heinous crime. In Spain, the situation is so dire that women don’t leave their house after dark for fear of being raped by Muslim men.

In Denmark, more than half of convicted rapists are Muslims. In Norway, there has been a dramatic spike in rapes. In Oslo, 10% of females over the age of 15 have been raped by Muslim men with Muslim men guilty of 100% of the rapes against Norwegian women. Rape in Oslo is now so common that hotels hand out key chain alarms when people check in and increasingly Norwegian women only go out in groups. As is the case throughout the West, anyone who speaks the truth about this is labeled a “racist.”

Meanwhile, in the face of this savagery, our political leaders, the media, academics, Muslims, feminists, and/or garden variety lemmings assert that Islam respects women, that it does not sanction the mistreatment of women, and/or that Western culture is a rape culture on par with ISIS. But no matter how persistently or how deeply these fools keep their increasingly vulnerable heads in the sand, it will not change reality. Quite the opposite. By denying the truth, these liars, apologists, and moral relativists fuel violence, rape, torture, enslavement, and death.
I hesitate to brand an entire group for the actions of a subset. But in this particular case I plead guilty to thinking 'muslim male = highly potential rapist.' And I also plead guilty to tarring most if not all muslims with the same brush. I don't see a wave of 'moderate' muslims decrying their cultural affinity towards rape, honor killings, female genital mutilation, murder of homosexuals, etc.

So I'll let our daughter traipse off to Spain, albeit with a shitload of fatherly warnings ("Beware the evil muslims"), most of which will go in one ear and out the other.

I only hope one or more of them will take root...






Saturday, January 11, 2014

Cleaning Up - Radical Islam Version

Continuing to purge my files of accumulated images. Today's theme is radical islam.





Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Return of FID

I haven't had a FID post in a while, so I thought I'd catch up on the latest from the Religion of Peace.

When I saw this story my head just about exploded. (H/T Moonbattery)
Public school students in Cambridge have the day off today in what officials believe is the first time a Massachusetts school district has scheduled a holiday to recognize an Islamic holy day.

The school holiday will recognize Eid al-Adha, also known as the Festival of Sacrifice. The day off to mark an Islamic holy day was approved by the Cambridge School Committee last year.
To be sure, schools often have days off for Christian and Jewish holidays. However, the last time I looked Christians and Jews aren't running around demanding under threats of violence and death that the societies and cultures they move into adapt to them, rather than the other way around.

Europe’s veil of fear (H/T BMEWS)
The office of French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo was badly damaged by a firebomb on Wednesday, after it published a spoof issue "guest edited" by the Prophet Muhammad to salute the victory of the Islamist party in Tunisia’s elections.
Much more at the link. Take a look. It's some very disturbing stuff.

Finally, BMEWS summed it all up with one short pithy phrase:

Where islam spreads ..... freedom dies

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

FID 2011.06.08

A teenage Muslim girl was stoned to death under 'Sharia law' after taking part in a beauty contest in Ukraine.
Katya Koren, 19, was found dead in a village in the Crimea region near her home.

Her battered body was buried in a forest and was found a week after she disappeared.

Police have opened a murder investigation and are looking into claims that three Muslim youths killed her, claiming her death was justified under Islam.

One of the three - named as 16-year-old Bihal Gaziev - is under arrest and told police that Katya had 'violated the laws of Sharia'. Gaziev has said he has no regrets about her death.
The saddest part of this story is that it is not an aberration.

Defenders of islam will often say that acts like these are committed only by muslim extremists; that moderates oppose them. There may be a grain of truth in that. After all, the wackos of the Westboro Baptist Church claim to be Christians, yet perform acts that are opposed by mainstream Christians. There are, however, a couple of critical differences.

The Westboro jackasses and others like them do not routinely maim and kill people. And they are actively opposed by many other Christians. There are counter-protests and other actions taken to contain, minimize, or eliminate the extremists' behavior. Those two elements are conspicuously absent in 'moderate' islam.

Until I see signs of the same in the islamic community I will continue to harbor doubts regarding the ability of islam to co-exist with other religions.

Wednesday, June 1, 2011

FID 2011.06.01

I have a daughter. I'd like to think she'll be a virgin on her wedding night, but I'm realistic enough to not believe that's going to happen. I'm also tolerant enough to give her and her figurative sisters some free rein. After all, girls just want to have fun.

Too bad the islamists aren't as tolerant.

Female protesters in Egypt were forced to submit to ‘virginity checks’ after being arrested.

Open wide and say ‘ahhh’
Women arrested by the Egyptian police during protests in Cairo’s Tahrir Square were subjected to forced ‘virginity tests’, according to Amnesty International. ... Amnesty today said that the women had been beaten, given electric shocks and then subjected to strip searches while being photographed by male soldiers. They were then given ‘virginity checks’ and threatened with prostitution charges if medics ruled they had had sex, according to the charity.

Curious about what life under Sharia law would be like? Wonder no more…
So where are the outraged liberals? Thank God (oops, excuse me)  - thank goodness for the deity-neutral umbrella of Amnesty International.
Amnesty International issued a statement Tuesday demanding that Egyptian authorities bring to justice those responsible for ordering or conducting forced “virginity tests” on female protesters.
. . .  
An Amnesty International  researcher said accounts gathered from women who were subjected to the tests showed they were done to check whether their hymens were broken.
In the interests of gender equality, I think we should subject all the male reporters and government figures to the equivalent 'virginity tests.' After all, what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

And while we're at it, let's test those holier-than-thou imams.

Go do some deep-knee bends over a fire hydrant, Abdul...

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

FID 2011.05.25

For Sale - Palestinian Alarm Clock. Only used once.

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

They're Not All Bad

If there were more Muslims willing to stand up and speak out like this one, perhaps there wouldn't be so much animosity towards them.

When speaking about the death of Osama bin Laden, Imam Hassan al-Qazwini of the Islamic Center of America in the Detroit suburb of Dearborn, the leader of one of the nation's largest mosques, had this to say about the now-fish food terrorist:
"There is no doubt that this man was a thug, he was a murderer," Imam Hassan al-Qazwini told worshippers at the Islamic Center of America in the Detroit suburb of Dearborn. "His hands were stained by the blood of thousands of innocent people — Muslims and non-Muslims alike."

Qazwini, who delivered his sermon in a large, circular hall filled to capacity, said the Quran is clear that someone who kills one innocent person "is doomed to hell forever." And the imam was particularly incensed that bin Laden "committed atrocities against innocent people ... while he was calling 'Allahu akbar,'" or "God is great."

"He's responsible for tarnishing the image of Islam in this country. He's responsible for tarnishing the image of Muslims," he said. "We're happy to see the man who caused so much pain for Muslims in this country is gone ... finally."
Good for al-Qazwini. Now where are the rest of his 'moderate' brethren...?

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

FID 2011.05.04

You just can't satisfy those assholes.

Islamic scholars criticize bin Laden's sea burial
Muslim clerics said Monday that Osama bin Laden's burial at sea was a violation of Islamic tradition that may further provoke militant calls for revenge attacks against American targets.

"The Americans want to humiliate Muslims through this burial, and I don't think this is in the interest of the U.S. administration," said Omar Bakri Mohammed, a radical cleric in Lebanon.
It shouldn't surprise anyone that the obama administration can't even bury a dead body without screwing up and pissing people off. And it also shouldn't surprise anyone that muslims are going to get pissed off at anything America does, even when it's done by a president that has a history of bending over backwards (or just bending over) to placate them.
President Barack Obama said the remains had been handled in accordance with Islamic custom, which requires speedy burial, and the Pentagon later said the body was placed into the waters of the northern Arabian Sea after adhering to traditional Islamic procedures — including washing the corpse — aboard the aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson.

But the Lebanese cleric Mohammed called it a "strategic mistake" that was bound to stoke rage.

Clerics in Iraq — where an offshoot of al-Qaida is blamed for the death of thousands of people since 2003 — also criticized the U.S. action. One said it only benefited fish.

"If a man dies on a ship that is a long distance from land, then the dead man should be buried at the sea," said Shiite cleric Ibrahim al-Jabari. "But if he dies on land, then he should be buried in the ground, not to be thrown into the sea. Otherwise, this would be only inviting fish to a banquet."
IMO the best quote about the whole burial thing is below (it's floating around on the 'Net - I have no idea where it originated).
"They dumped his body in the ocean. That way, whenever you go to the beach you can piss on his grave." 



Wednesday, April 27, 2011

FID 2011.04.27

From BMEWS: More evidence why the West should ban the burka.
Women who do not wear head scarves are being threatened with violence and even death by Islamic extremists . . .,” states the opening sentence of an April 18 story in the Daily Mail in Britain.

Sadly, nothing unusual there, except that these threats are being made to non-Muslim women. Again, this is not unusual, since that happens throughout much of the Islamic world that imposes rules about dress on all women, regardless of their religion.

What makes the above news so disturbing is the women who are being threatened with violence and even death by Islamic extremists for not wearing a hijab (the Muslim head covering) and a veil (the niqab) are non-Muslim women living in . . . wait for it . . . Great Britain. Yes, you read that correctly. Non-Muslim women in a free and democratic country are being threatened with violence or death...

This story, and others like it, should put to rest the nonsensical arguments of people who say that the niqab (which leaves just a slit for the eyes) and the burka (which even covers the eyes with a mesh) are just another choice of clothing that women can make. History simply does not back that up. Wherever the niqab becomes common, it eventually becomes mandatory and women are never given a choice of what to wear again.

“The burka and the niqab is the political uniform of the regiments of the Muslim Brotherhood, which is a fascist, supremacist organization,” explained (Tarek Fatah, renowned author and founder of the secular group Muslim Canadian Congress)...

“You can’t wear a swastika today and not be a Nazi, and the niqab is the swastika of the Muslim Brotherhood,” added Fatah.

Nevertheless, our (Canadian) Supreme Court has ruled that it’s unconstitutional, for instance, to ban the Hells Angels criminal organization members from wearing their colours. The big difference, however, is the Hells Angels don’t want every other person on the streets to also wear their uniform. If Islamo-fascists have their way ... they will impose their oppressive dress code on all women, regardless of their individual beliefs. Therein lies the difference.


Wednesday, April 20, 2011

FID 2011.04.20

Barack Obama dies and somehow ends up in heaven. (I know, I know - the idea of obama going to Heaven is far fetched, but work with me on this...)

At the Gates of Heaven, he meets a man with a beard.

'Are you Mohammed?' Obama asks.

'No my son, I am St. Peter. Mohammed is higher up.' Peter then points to a ladder that rises into the clouds.

Delighted that Mohammed should be higher than St. Peter, Obama climbs the ladder up through the clouds and comes into a room where he sees another bearded man. He asks again, 'Are you Mohammed?'

'Why no,' the man answers, 'I am Moses. Mohammed is higher still.'

Exhausted, but with a heart full of joy Obama climbs the ladder yet again. He discovers a much larger room where he meets an angelic looking man with a beard. Full of hope, he asks again, 'Are you Mohammed?'

'No, I am Jesus, the Christ. You will find Mohammed higher up.'

Mohammed - higher than Jesus!  Man, oh man!  Obama can hardly contain his delight and climbs and climbs ever higher. Once again, he reaches an even larger room where he meets this truly magnificent looking man with a silver white beard and once again repeats his question. 'Are you Mohammed?' he gasps, as he is by now totally out of breath from all his climbing.

'No, my son.... I am Almighty God, the Alpha and the Omega. But you look exhausted. Would you like a cup of coffee?'

Obama says, “Yes please.'

God looks over his shoulder, claps his hands, and yells out, "Hey Mohammed - two coffees!"

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

FID 2011.04.13

The big news in Europe is the French banning the burqa (or burka, or however that face-covering rag is spelled). For once, I'm proud of the French. They actually showed some couilles (that's French slang for testicles).

Vive La France!
Women are fighting in the streets of Paris. Alas, they are not fighting against Islamic gender apartheid—they are not protesting arranged marriage or honor killings. Instead, they are fighting for the right to veil their faces (*end sarcasm*).

It is important to note that France has not banned the headscarf (hijab) and that the French ban is not specific to Islam. The French law is ethnicity- and religion-neutral and refers only to a generic “face-covering.”
In other words, ski masks and cowboy-style bandannas are also banned, but I don't see Jean-Claude Killy or Roy Rogers protesting.
Increasingly hostile and anti-assimilationist Muslim immigrants (have) poured into France ... Why leave Mecca or Kandahar if you want France to resemble it in every way? 
... the burqa is not religiously mandated by Islam. It is a political and jihadic statement. There is a long, long history of Muslim-majority countries allowing women to shed the face veil and burqa (Egypt, Turkey, Algeria, Lebanon, and Iran to name a few). Only recently has one Muslim country after another returned to this misogynist custom, and with a vengeance.
Keep in mind that comment about "the burqa is not religiously mandated by Islam." Below is a similar commentary by Dr Taj Hargey, who is Imam of the Oxford Islamic Congregation and Chairman of the Muslim Educational Centre of Oxford. He makes the same point.

The burka is an alien, cultural monstrosity
The decision by the French government to outlaw all forms of public face-masking, including the burka and niqab, is welcomed by all thinking Muslims around the world.

All the Koran requires is that both genders dress modestly...

Face-masking is a pre-Islamic Byzantine and Persian practice and is non-existent in the Koran. Indeed, since Muslim women are banned from hiding their faces while praying or when they perform the pilgrimage, why do they need to do so in the public realm?
So what's all the fuss about? IMO it's best explained by a quote from the first article:
"The burqa is not a dress, it’s a message, one that clearly communicates the subjugation, the subservience, the crushing and the defeat of women..."
Where's NOW when we need them...?

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

FID 2011.04.06

Peace-loving Muslims Object to Koran-burning

No, wait ... that's not quite right.

Beserk Muslims Run Amuck, Massacre More Than 20

Yeah, that's better.
... Afghan rioters angered by reports of the sacrilege sacked the United Nations compound in the city of Mazar-e-Sharif, killing seven foreigners, and went on a lethal rampage in the southern city of Kandahar, waving Taliban flags.

In fresh Kandahar protests on Sunday, two Afghans, including a child, were killed and 40 were wounded, according to provincial officials.
Granted, the whack job in Florida who burned the damn thing is an idiot, but the muslim reaction is WAY out of proportion to the stimulus. Since when does burning a book give a mob license to riot, destroy, and kill innocent people, including women, children, and UN workers there to help the local savages attain some vestige of civilization?

And then we have an idiot senator (redundant, I know) who thinks we should restrict free speech to avoid offending muslims.
South Carolina U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham signaled support for restricting the First Amendment Sunday, just days after a pastor burned a Quran.
Let me get this straight. They can burn the Bible and U.S. flags, stone and lash women, murder children, but we can't do anything that might offend them? At what point do we quit bending over backwards to placate these narrow-minded religious bigots and just say "enough is enough?"

I'd say right about now...



Wednesday, March 30, 2011

FID 2011.03.30

Too tired to think of anything original (I can handle preparing for class and grading, but the administrative drones are heaping giant piles of dung on the faculty. Burrowing out from under requires an inordinate expenditure of energy) so I'm resorting to Google Images for today's FID.

To make up for my sloth, you get a two-fer: FID + FOD.

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

FID 2011.03.23

Go here to have some fun blowing away osama bin ladin.

Warning - it's addictive...

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

FID 2011.03.09

Like the old saying goes, be careful what you wish for. Via BMEWS, we have a sobering and troubling article that cautions the West about assuming that the recent turmoil in Arab countries - Tunisia, Bahrain, and Egypt, among others - means that the mythical 'Arab in the street' yearns for freedom from the shackles of Islamic fundamentalism.
The phrase ‘Arab Spring’ is being touted as if we were witnessing an unambiguous leap forward for ordinary Arabs: history marching towards democracy and pluralism.

No one wishes to contemplate, let alone prepare for, the alternative — that this might end in the restoration of authoritarian rule or, worse, the triumph of a radical Islam.
...

It is a great mistake to assume democracy is an enemy of Islamism. When the gift of democracy is unwrapped in the Arab world, Islamists frequently spring out of the box.

The jihadis may be despised by most Muslims, but often in Arab countries, only about 20 to 40 per cent of the population vote. It is by no means impossible for the Islamists to secure a majority from the minority because their supporters are the most fanatical.

Whatever the theory of democratisation in the Arab world, the history is clear: where democracy, however tentatively, has already been introduced, it is the Islamists who have come to power.

Democracy came to Morocco, and now the fundamentalist Party for Justice and Development (PJD) increases its number of seats at each election: it is only a matter of time before the party forms a majority in parliament.

Democracy came to Gaza, and the Islamist group Hamas took power. In Bahrain, following democratic reforms a decade ago, there is now a fundamentalist Sunni block dominating the elected chamber — despite the fact that the country’s population is 70 per cent Shia.

Ditto Yemen. Even in Egypt, where the Muslim Brotherhood was officially outlawed, the group won a quarter of the parliamentary seats up for grabs six years ago.

But the Islamists seldom want to take control of the government machine; they have little interest in setting tax or energy policy. The influence they seek is cultural totalitarianism.
Not just in the Arab world, but everywhere. They have absolutely no concept of "live and let live."
What they need is a government sufficiently biddable to allow them to impose their cultural tyranny — and to succeed, they don’t need majority support. All the Islamists require is to be louder, more forceful and better organised than their opponents.
It would be foolish to argue that Arabs are somehow incapable of stable democratic government. There is, indeed, a chance that they are setting out on a turbulent path to a brighter future, free from repressive dogma.
We can only hope...

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

FID 2011.03.02

My daughter just walked into the living room and said, "Daddy, cancel my allowance, rent my room out, throw all my clothes out of the window, take my TV, stereo, iPhone and jewelry to the charity shop. Sell my car, take my front door key and throw me out of the house".

Well, she didn't actually put it like that. Her exact words were "This is my new boyfriend, Mohammed."



Muslim dating...

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

FID 2011.02.23

Two news articles that illustrate the gulf between us and them:

Muslim pupils learn to cut off hands of thieves
Muslim children are being taught how to chop off thieves’ hands and that Jews are plotting to take over the world at a network of Islamic schools...

Up to 5,000 pupils attending weekend schools across Britain are being exposed to textbooks claiming that some Jews were transformed into pigs and apes, and that some offences could be punished with stoning. One book for six year-olds warns that those who do not believe in Islam will be condemned to “hellfire” in death.

Another text for 15 year-olds teaches that thieves who break Sharia law should have their hands cut off for a first offence and their feet amputated for a subsequent crime. Teenagers are presented with diagrams showing where the cuts should be made.
 A diagram from one of the text books
For acts of sodomy, children are told that the penalty is death. A textbook says there are different views on whether this should be done by stoning, or burning with fire, or throwing over a cliff. Textbooks for 15 year-olds revive the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” which teach that Jews want world domination.
Can you imagine the homework assignments from that class? I'll give them credit for one thing, though. I doubt if any of their teachers will go out on strike.

Closer to home, we have this nonsense.

Muslim Extremists attempting ‘Day of Rage’ in U.S. on March 3
...Muslim extremists Anjem Choudary, Abu Izzadeen and Sayful Islam ... are planning to stand on American soil in front of the White House on March 3 and proclaim a “call to arms” in which they will “call for Sharia law to be established across the U.S.,” according to the Daily Mail on Sunday.
Oh please stand on my front lawn and proclaim a muslim "call to arms" - please, please, please. There'll be a call to arms, all right, but it won't be the one they're hoping for.
Anjem Choudary is the same extremist who has insisted that the Islamic flag will one day fly over the White House.
What the hell more does he want? It's damn near flying there already.
It would seem that Brigitte Gabriel’s warning about the attempt of Muslim Extremists to force an Islamic government into power in the United States is beginning to manifest.  The Arab Christian is the founder and president of ACT! for America and has written a bestselling book entitled They Must Be Stopped: Why We Must Defeat Radical Islam and How We Can Do It.  She told One News Now earlier this month that, “I actually dedicate a chapter to the Muslim Brotherhood's project for North America -- not only to what they have done in the Middle East and their goals of bringing back an Islamic government totalitarian regime worldwide, but their plan to the United States as well.”

She also stated that, “We not only have the fox watching the hen house; we have the fox inside the hen house right now," she notes. "This is why Obama is being wishy-washy on what's happening in Egypt, because the Obama administration right now is basically taking advice on Middle East policy from the Muslim Brotherhood front organizations in America."
I guess it's too much to expect that osama-oops-I-mean-obama would turn his attention from the War on Wisconsin and focus instead on the muslim pirates killing Americans.
Pirate leader Farah, speaking from Bayla, a pirate haven in the semi-autonomous region of Puntland in northern Somalia, vowed to avenge the deaths and capture of his comrades.

"I lost the money I invested and my comrades. No forgiveness for the Americans. Revenge. Our business will go on," he said, adding he had spent $110,000 so far in the hijacking, including on weapons and food and salaries.
Let me see if I've got this straight. We know who the pirates are, we know where they're located, and we're (read: obama) not doing a damn thing about it!?!?! Where the hell are Teddy Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan when we need them? Instead, we've got a Jimmy Carter clone cowering in the White House while our enemies around the world are laughing out loud at us (and our friends are quietly snickering and sadly shaking their heads).
"The intent always had been that this would be a negotiated process and not ever go into a point where we actually had gunfire," said Vice Admiral Mark Fox, the head of U.S. naval forces in the turbulent region.
The only thing that will stop those animals from continuing is if the cost exceeds the benefits. That does not mean a 'negotiated process.' It means gunfire, and lots of it, plus explosions, flames, knives, spears, arrows ... you get the point.

And so will they, if anyone in the federal government ever grows a pair of cojones...

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

FID 2011.02.16 - Great Minds Think Alike

In an earlier post I commented on how influential figures in Great Britain and Singapore were finally recognizing the folly of expecting muslims to assimilate into an existing culture. Now we have the French piling on.  

Sarkozy Joins Cameron, Merkel, Condemns Multiculturalism
French President Nicolas Sarkozy agrees with other European leaders who say multiculturalism has failed.

Speaking on a French television program, Sarkozy echoed the remarks of British Prime Minister David Cameron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel. Last week, Cameron flatly declared multiculturalism a sad failure, and Merkel said as much in October.

"My answer is clearly yes, it is a failure," Sarkozy said, adding...

If you come to France, you accept to melt into a single community, which is the national community, and if you do not want to accept that, you cannot be welcome in France....

We have been too concerned about the identity of the person who was arriving and not enough about the identity of the country that was receiving him.
Amen to that, brother. Who ever would have thought that the French, the British, and the Germans would agree on something?

The story goes on to point out:
Thanks to Islamic immigration, France is a literal mess. Outside Paris, Muslims have established what the French call no-go zones, in which native French and police dare not set foot.
Don't hear that mentioned in the lamestream press, do we?
In August 2009, the French no-go zone of Bagnolet went up in flames thanks to Muslims rioters, a reprise of the major Muslim attacks in 2005 that paralyzed the city and the nation's politicians.
(The French government's) response to the unrest was to offer more welfare to African Muslims and blame themselves for not doing their part in making the Muslims feel welcome in the City of Lights.

When Muslims across Gaul erupted into that mad rage in 2005, French President Jacques Chirac rushed to blame his countrymen. 
Geez, does that sound like some of our 'progressive' politicians?
... Chirac said Muslims rioted because of the “ghettoization of youths of African or North African origin” and “the incapacity of French society to fully accept them.”

Chirac also thought his country “has not done everything possible for these youths, supported them so they feel understood, heard and respected,” citing high unemployment among the African immigrants.

Unsurprisingly, French law began to reflect that view. It now punishes those who criticize Islam. Authorities have prosecuted actress Brigitte Bardot five times for comments about the Muslim invasion and the grisly practices of Muslims when slaughtering livestock.
Prosecuting Brigitte Bardot? She's a whack job, but only to the extent of being firmly on the side of the animals. She could care less about the religious leanings of whoever is swinging the sledgehammer.
France, however, may have wised up. It recently banned the burqa, the medieval head-to-toe covering that strict Muslim men expect their women to wear, as well as other face-covering veils.
Who ever would have thought that the French, of all people, would lead the way in defending the roots of Western culture?
Sarkozy is the third European head of state to admit the truth about multiculturalism, which for all intents and purposes means admitting the truth that Muslims are not assimilating, and that native Europeans are tired of listening to their ridiculous demands and caterwauling about rights.
Muslims are not assimilating - who woulda thunk? Only several centuries of world history have provided a hint.
We need to think much harder who it’s in the public interest to work with. Some organizations that seek to present themselves a gateway to the Muslims community are showered with public money despite doing little to combat extremism.…

So let’s properly judge these organizations:

Do they believe in universal human rights — including for women and people of other faiths?

Do they believe in equality of all before the law?

Do they believe in democracy and the right of people to elect their own government?

Do they encourage integration or separatism?
The answers to the above questions are, as the saying goes, "intuitively obvious to even the most uninterested observer.'
Problem is, the immigrants they invited in are demanding sweeping changes in laws that would allow them to carry on as if they were a separate society. In Britain, for instance, as The New American has reported, Muslims have been agitating for and receiving special treatment. Swimming pools in London accommodate Muslim sensibilities in bathing attire. Schools serve halal food. Prison guards have been forbidden to wear St. George’s Cross because it supposedly offends Muslims prisoners sensitive about the Crusades.
Pardon my French, but to quote the old ballad:

"Fuck 'em all, fuck 'em all, the long, the short and the tall..."