If you have trouble following that mangled syntax, what I'm trying to say is that the media's botched coverage of the incident and subsequent developments has become so egregious that it has become its own story.
Coverage of media coverage of the Trayvon Martin shooting has now fully separated from the actual events of February 26, 2012, and become a separate story in its own right, as have political attempts to manipulate perceptions of the case. Two important updates on the media front:Of course, NBC has a long and proud tradition of selectively editing their 'news' programs to reflect their world-view. Remember the faked GM pickup fires?
First, NBC News has launched an “internal investigation” of how a heavily edited version of the audio from George Zimmerman’s 911 call on the March 27 broadcast of the “Today” show. The same “mistake” was made in a written transcript published at MSNBC.com.
It should be a fairly short “internal investigation,” because the brass just needs to figure out who decided to edit the following conversation between Zimmerman and the dispatcher:
ZIMMERMAN: This guy looks like he's up to no good… or he's on drugs or something. It's raining and he's just walking around, looking about.
DISPATCHER: Okay, is this guy, is he white, black, or Hispanic?
ZIMMERMAN: He looks black.
… into this: “This guy looks like he’s up to no good… he looks black.” As deceptive edits go, it’s rather clumsy, isn’t it? Not to mention grossly irresponsible, given the volatile situation surrounding the Sanford case.
In 1993 (a NBC spokesman) admitted "NBC had misled viewers when it showed a simulated crash in which a gas tank on the G.M. truck exploded into flames ... in its apology Tuesday night, the network cited its use of an incendiary device to ignite an explosion and its failure to inform the viewers about the device.Returning to the present day and the Trayvon Martin story:
Meanwhile, ABC News manufactured a “scoop” last week by releasing edited video from the Sanford Police Department, ostensibly “proving” that Zimmerman didn’t have any visible injuries. Since Zimmerman claims to have been physically assaulted by Trayvon Martin, a lack of injuries would do some damage to his story.So far CBS hasn't been caught doctoring transcripts or altering recordings, but given its track record, it's probably only a matter of time. After all, during the 2004 presidential election they produced bogus memos purporting to show irregularities in George W. Bush's national Guard service records.
But ABC not only failed to remind its readers that Zimmerman was treated by paramedics at the scene of Martin’s death – a well-established hard fact documented in police reports. They also used an on-screen graphic to obscure Zimmerman’s head at a crucial moment in their “big scoop” video clip. Without this graphic, viewers can see a rather large gash on the back of Zimmerman’s head, which is totally consistent with his story, and completely destroys the action line for ABC’s “reporting.” The video loudly touted as showing no injuries did, in fact, depict what appears to be a significant injury.
Lo and behold, ABC News has now produced an “enhanced” version of the security camera video, and whaddya know – it’s another sizzling-hot blockbuster scoop, which just happens to completely erase the previous scoop, because after more “enhancement and re-digitization” than Disney deployed to create Tron:Legacy, it turns out ABC’s sharp-eyed analysts can see that scar too!
Thus, ABC News claims to have “revealed for the first time” what everyone who didn’t fall for their earlier “scoop” could easily see with their own eyes, by viewing the unedited security tape. Maybe a sufficiently loud cry of “Whoops!” will make an internal investigation unnecessary.
Dan Rather admitted he'd been chasing the story for five years--proof that there was something in George W. Bush's National Guard record that would convince people not to vote for him.That fiasco resulted in the memorable statement uttered by CBS in its defense that the memos were "fake, but accurate."
Even Walter Cronkite would be embarrassed by that one.
Gosh, if you can't trust NBC, ABC, and CBS, who can you trust?
5 comments:
I was just talking to a friend about how our Tuesday newspaper always has several small font, inside page corrections of the splashy front page stories from the weekend. And they are always 'corrections' not 'we lied' statements. My conservative estimate is that 75% of the 'incorrect reports' are intentional, knowing that most of the original readers won't ever see the correction.
I've always thought that 'corrections' should be the same size font and be published on the same page as the original misstatement.
Good points all... Sigh...
NFO - 'Sigh' is right ... Sigh...
Randum Thoughts- The MSM is like the weather, everybody talks about it but no one does anything to fix it. Maybe, too, it's too late to do anything and we're just waiting for nature to take it's course. You know, if it weren't for Drudge and Breitbart, I don't know what I'd do. But.. if MSM means Mainstream Media, then Drudge and Breitbart ARE the MSM and the other's ARE already dead. Things happen fast these days.
Post a Comment