Most of yesterday's news was focused on the Brexit vote -
Britain's decision to leave the European Union.
The stunning vote, 52 percent to 48 percent, plunged world financial markets into turmoil, the political consequences for the prime minister of Britain were swift, and the people around the globe reacted with shock and confusion.
FWIW, I heartily applaud the outcome. Anytime a populace can shed one layer of corrupt and inept politicians, along with the accompanying regulatory and bureaucratic overkill, indifference, and incompetence, well, that's a good thing.
It also shows that the 'silent majority' is alive and well, and is 'mad as hell and not going to take it anymore.' That may have implications for our own election come November.
But while Brexit hogged most of the headlines and airtime, several other noteworthy stories snuck under the radar. Just in case you missed them:
Senate gun compromise survives first test vote
The Senate voted Thursday to allow further consideration of bipartisan legislation banning gun sales to people on the terrorism "no-fly" list.
Senate Republicans could have killed the measure, but several sided with Democrats in allowing it to go forward.
No doubt the crybabies and spoiled brats who participated in the House sit-in protesting lack of action are pleased.
The premise - that someone who is considered too dangerous to board a commercial flight should be denied the right to buy a firearm - is hard to argue with. But, as always, the devil is in the details.
No Fly, No Buy? No Way
The problem with No Fly-No Buy is the foundation upon which the law would be based. The No Fly List is riddled with problems, from its secrecy (a violation of the Privacy Act), to its over-inclusiveness – the late Sen. Edward Kennedy was on the list at one point. The liberal lion even spoke out against the list, worried that the rights of non-senators could very easily be violated.
IMO Teddy should have been labeled a terrorist. After all,
he killed Mary Jo Kopechne and then tried to cover up his culpability. But that doesn't negate the fact that the list is basically a form of 'guilty until proven innocent,' which is a gross perversion of our country's legal foundation.
In a delicious bit of irony, a muslim terrorist group spoke out against the proposed gun control legislation.
CAIR blasts Terrorist Firearms Prevention Act: ‘Mandela himself’ was on watch list
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has issued a statement blasting legislation proposed Tuesday that would keep suspected terrorists from purchasing firearms, saying it lacks due process and unfairly targets Muslims.
“We oppose the Terrorist Firearms Prevention Act of 2016 because it appears to limit the ban on firearms purchases to American Muslims..."
Funny, that's not how I read the bill. I guess CAIR, like most of us, is having a difficult time distinguishing terrorists and muslims.
But they do have a point regarding the secrecy and appeals process. And, as they point out, in addition to Teddy Kennedy, another famous person was on the list.
“Nelson Mandela, then former South African president, Nobel Prize winner and anti-Apartheid leader was on a U.S. terrorism watch list until 2008,” the group said. “Mandela himself needed special State Department clearance to visit the United States in 2008".
It seems like a simple process. Fix the list first, then worry about 'No Fly, No Buy.' But I guess that's too complicated for liberals. So here's a proposal they might understand.
Just to be clear, here's my position.
In other news,
Clinton failed to hand over key email to State Department.
Former Secretary Hillary Clinton failed to turn over a copy of a key message involving problems caused by her use of a private homebrew email server, the State Department confirmed Thursday. The disclosure makes it unclear what other work-related emails may have been deleted by the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee.
Speaking of Hillary:
Clinton’s State Dept. calendar missing scores of entries
An Associated Press review of the official calendar Hillary Clinton kept as secretary of state identified at least 75 meetings with longtime political donors, Clinton Foundation contributors and corporate and other outside interests that were not recorded or omitted the names of those she met.
The fuller details of those meetings were included in files the State Department turned over to the AP after it sued the government in federal court.
Expect nothing but yawns from the left and the media on those stories. After all, Hillary can do no wrong in their eyes.
While hillary does the political version of rope-a-dope, her partner in crime continues to treat the U.S. Constitution as an afterthought.
Obama: I'm Still Not Enforcing Immigration Law, No Matter What The Court Says
President Barack Obama said Thursday that despite the U.S. Supreme Court’s tie vote, which essentially blocks his immigration plan, the millions of illegal immigrants that he sought to make legal with his executive action will remain a low priority for deportation by his administration.
“Enforcement priorities developed by my administration are not affected by this ruling.”
Translation: “I am above the law. I can do whatever I want, and there’s nothing anyone can do to stop me.”
Asshole…
Meanwhile, in Baltimore:
Freddie Gray verdict: Baltimore officer who drove van not guilty on all charges
Baltimore police officer Caesar Goodson, who drove the van in which Freddie Gray was fatally injured, was found not guilty Thursday on all charges, including the most serious count of second-degree depraved-heart murder.
… the state has failed to secure a single conviction following three high-profile trials.
Four other officers await trial, but legal experts are now questioning whether those cases will hold up.
"It does not bode well for prosecution," CNN legal analyst Danny Cevallos said.
I'm sure the Black Lives Matter clowns are beside themselves over that, but frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn.
Remember, folks, a magician distracts you with one hand while tricking you with the other. So keep asking yourself "What are they
really up to?"